— 10 min read
Unit Price Contracts in Construction
Last Updated Dec 18, 2024
Last Updated Dec 18, 2024
A unit price contract is an agreement where the client pays the contractor for individual portions or “units” of work.
In construction, a unit price contract is calculated based on the cost of each separate unit of work instead of a fixed fee for the entire project — in contrast to lump sum and GMP contracts. Unit price contracts are often referred to as measurement contracts, measure and pay contracts, or remeasurement contracts because payment is based on the measured quantities of the completed work.
In this article, we’ll explore unit price contracts and their advantages and disadvantages — plus an example of a unit price contract at work.
Table of contents
How Unit Price Contracts Work
A unit price contract is an agreement that divides the work into fixed-cost units that the contractor bills for separately. In essence, a unit price contract establishes a set cost for a specific, repetitive element of a project, which is defined as a "unit."
In other words, the unit price reflects all costs of performing a predetermined portion of work — like excavating ten cubic metres of soil or laying one kilometre of a sewer pipe.
When tendering for a unit price contract, the contractor will do the following:
- Estimate the cost of materials for the unit of work
- Estimate the labour cost, including overhead costs and profit markup, to complete that unit of work
- Add the material and labour costs together to determine the unit price for that specific and defined portion of the work
Unit price contracts are commonly used in construction projects where the duration, scope, or requirements may be incomplete or difficult to estimate or involve repetitive tasks or resources.
Unit price contracts are usually relatively easy to negotiate due to their straightforward pricing model that calculates the cost of each chunk of work. The contractor provides estimates for the cost of individual units and owners can then compare and negotiate prices for those units.
When to Use Unit Price Contracts
In unit price contracts, the amount the contractor bills reflects the completed work or provided units. Because of this, using a unit price contract is the logical choice for projects in which the ultimate quantity of work is uncertain. This is especially true for projects where the scope or duration is undefined and entails repetitive elements. This approach provides greater adaptability to adjust costs as the project unfolds and actual quantities become apparent.
Unit Pricing in Other Contract Types
In construction, project owners and contractors may use different contract components to build the right contract for a project, and unit pricing is no exception. Here are a few common ways unit pricing is used in other contract types:
1. Lump Sum Contract with Unit Price for Extras
In a lump sum contract, the contractor agrees to do all of the work for a fixed price. But there can still be unit prices included in the contract for extra work. For example, if there is a potential that more excavation than anticipated may be required, the contract may specify a unit price for any additional excavation beyond the scope included in the lump sum.
2. Cost-Plus Contract with Unit Prices
In a cost-plus contract, the contractor is paid for the actual costs of materials and labour, plus a percentage or fixed fee for overhead and profit. Unit prices might be used in this type of contract to estimate certain portions of the work or to handle changes or additions to the scope.
3. Time and Materials with Unit Pricing
In a time and materials contract, the contractor is paid for the actual cost of labour and materials. A unit price schedule could be used to determine the price for certain tasks that are repetitive or predictable.
Advantages of Unit Price Contracts
Both project owners and contractors can benefit from unit price contracts. Here are some examples of the advantages of unit pricing:
Owners | Contractors |
---|---|
Straightforward pricing Unit price contracts provide a straightforward and clear pricing structure. | Decreases risk By billing for the units completed, contractors can reduce their risk of disputes. Under this agreement type, they are also not responsible for cost overruns. |
Adaptability Allows flexibility in adjusting costs as the project progresses and actual quantities needed become clearer. | Easy to invoice Once the unit price is determined, invoicing the client usually requires simple multiplication. |
Greater cost control By basing prices on the actual quantities of work performed or materials used, unit price contracts allow for more effective cost control by the owner, who can monitor these quantities completed and make adjustments as needed. | Effective resource management By concentrating on the actual units of work performed or materials used, unit pricing incentivizes contractors to ensure that resources are allocated efficiently, reducing waste and increasing profitability. |
Easy cost comparison Unit pricing is a simple way of outlining cost which allows for owners to easily compare proposals from different contractors. | Improved cash flow Compared to other types of contracts, the simplified invoicing process of unit price contracts can enhance cash flow by shortening the time between billing and payment. |
Increased efficiency Because the contractor is paid based on the quantity of work performed, they are incentivized to work efficiently and effectively. | Increased opportunity for profitability The repetitive nature of the work provides an opportunity for the contractor to become increasingly more efficient at tackling each unit, reducing the amount of time each unit takes to complete and resulting in higher profits. |
In summary, a unit price contract can offer advantages for both contractors and owners. Contractors benefit from greater pricing transparency and assurance of payment for work performed, while owners benefit from increased visibility into project costs and the flexibility to adjust the scope of work as needed.
Disadvantages of Unit Price Contracts
While unit price contracts offer many advantages, understanding the drawbacks for both parties involved and how to mitigate them is key to a successful project. Here are a few of the disadvantages of unit price contracts for both owners and contractors:
Owners | Contractors |
---|---|
Cost uncertainty As unit pricing is based on actual quantities of work performed or materials used, it can be more challenging to accurately estimate the total cost of a project upfront. This may make it difficult for owners to plan their budget effectively and may result in unanticipated cost overruns. | Inaccurate pricing can tank profitability Accurately estimating the unit price with all of the variables involved can be difficult, which could result in under-tendering and reduced profits. |
Potentially higher cost Unit pricing contracts may result in less motivation for contractors to minimize costs and maximize efficiency compared to other contract types. As a result, the same project may end up costing more for the owner. | High administrative burden Unit price contracts require contractors to maintain accurate records of the materials used and the work performed to receive compensation. This can increase the administrative workload and require additional resources to manage, which can impact the profitability of the project. |
Limited scope flexibility Unit price contracts are frequently utilized for repetitive tasks, which can limit the flexibility of the project scope. If unexpected changes arise, it may be challenging to include them in the unit price contract, depending on how it’s structured. | Fixed pricing Unless the contract allows for renegotiation, a contractor may be bound to the predetermined cost of materials and labour even if market fluctuations cause abrupt changes, affecting their profits. |
Overcoming the Challenges of Unit Pricing
There are several potential solutions to mitigate the disadvantages of a unit price contract, including the following.
Require regular cost tracking and updates.
Requiring regular tracking of costs and updates to the project budget can help identify potential cost overruns early on, giving the owner and contractor the opportunity to make necessary adjustments to stay on track.
Set up a document-sharing system.
Set up a documentation system for both parties to easily share information including documents regarding work completed, materials used and labour hours. This helps to minimize potential disagreements and disputes later while increasing transparency and promoting a more collaborative relationship between both parties.
Include a clause for price adjustments.
If a contract extends over a period of several years, including a clause that allows for price adjustments to reflect current market conditions and prices is key for contractor profitability. To prevent misunderstandings or disputes later on, it is crucial for both parties to come to an agreement on the terms and conditions for price adjustments upfront. Furthermore, the contract should explicitly outline the timing and methods for making price adjustments, as well as the procedures for informing the other party about any modifications.
Example of Unit Price Contract
We’ve discussed the ins and outs of unit price contracts. Let’s look at a hypothetical scenario of how these contract types play out in a construction project.
A government agency approaches PavePro Construction, a contractor specializing in road and roadway construction, about a new roadway project. For this project, the agency doesn’t clearly understand the exact quantity of materials required or the exact duration. In this case, a unit price contract is the best solution, allowing for greater flexibility.
The agency decides to use a unit price contract in order to simplify negotiations and quickly start the project. PavePro Construction divides the work into identifiable chunks and then calculates the unit price for each including the quantity of materials used, such as concrete and asphalt, overhead and labour costs as well as adds in their profit markup. The nature of this work is repeatable, with each unit involving the same equipment, materials and labour, so the contractor is able to easily calculate the cost per unit or chunk of work. Despite the agency's uncertainty regarding the number of units needed to complete the project, they agreed to PavePro’s unit price, and both parties signed the agreement.
Under a unit price contract, PavePro Construction is paid based on the actual units of work performed or the quantity of materials used, rather than a fixed or lump-sum price. The client is therefore protected from overpaying for the work done, while PavePro Construction is incentivized to complete the project as efficiently as possible in order to maximize their profit.
During construction, PavePro Construction keeps detailed records of the units of work performed and the quantity of materials used and submits invoices to the agency on a regular basis. The invoices, submitted based on the payment terms and schedule dictated in the contract, include a breakdown of the units executed and the corresponding cost. This provides the client with a transparent view of the project's progress as well as cost updates, allowing them to track the project against their budget.
The agency decided to extend the roadway by an additional ten kilometres, which was not part of the agreed-upon initial project scope with the contractor. However, under the unit price contract, the agency can easily request the contractor to take on the additional work without the need for renegotiation. The contractor then simply bills for the additional units constructed once completed.
Once the project is complete, PavePro Construction provides the client with all the necessary documentation, including invoices and receipts, along with a final invoice that outlines the total cost of the project. The client conducts a final inspection and approves payment to PavePro Construction.
Mitigating Risk With Unit Pricing
Overall, a unit price contract offers a balanced approach to risk-sharing for all parties on a project and mitigates risk in projects where scope, duration or requirements may be unclear.
The contractor takes on the risk of pricing individual units of work, while the owner assumes the risk for the project as a whole, creating a mutually beneficial relationship where both parties share in the risks and rewards of the project.
Categories:
Tags:
Written by
David Giali
9 articles
David is a Content Marketing Associate at Procore. He is an experienced writer in the software industry with close to 1000 published articles. Before writing, he worked in for a specialty contractor as an estimator and finish contractor. David spends his time outdoors with his wife and dog, experimenting with film photography, and writing music.
View profileTaylor Riso
65 articles
Taylor Riso is a marketing professional with more than 10 years of experience in the construction industry. Skilled in content development and marketing strategies, she leverages her diverse experience to help professionals in the built environment. She currently resides in Portland, Oregon.
View profileReviewed by
Kristen Frisa
43 articles
Kristen Frisa is a contributing writer for Procore. She also contributes to a variety of industry publications as a freelance writer focused on finance and construction technology. Kristen holds a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy and History from Western University, with a post-graduate certificate in journalism from Sheridan College. She lives in Ontario, Canada.
View profileExplore more helpful resources
Schedule of Values in Construction Explained
A schedule of values (SOV) is an itemized list of each activity required to complete the scope of work on a construction project, along with the corresponding costs or values....
The 5 Key Types of Construction Contracts
There are five common types of construction contracts: lump sum (or fixed price), time and materials (T&M), unit price, guaranteed maximum price (GMP), and cost-plus. Each of these contract types...
Design-Build vs Design-Tender-Build: Which Is Right for Your Project?
Construction project delivery methods dictate how project stakeholders interact throughout the construction phases. Design-build and design-tender-build are two of the most common delivery methods. While their names sound similar, they...
Construction Specifications: The Foundation for Project Clarity
When people hear the term “construction documents,” their minds often go straight to the applicable drawings. Those visual representations of what will be built provide a huge measure of guidance...