— 6 min read
Building a Culture of Quality in Construction: How Safety Approaches Can Transform Quality
Last Updated Mar 31, 2025
Last Updated Mar 31, 2025

The UK construction industry faces persistent quality issues that compromise safety, inflate costs, and erode trust. Despite universal pursuit of excellence, high rates of rework and defects cost billions annually and fail to deliver value to clients. Investigations such as the Grenfell Inquiry, various cladding inquiries, and numerous reports highlight systemic failures and devastating consequences of poor quality control. These incidents serve as stark reminders of what's at stake when quality is neglected.
Reforms like those from the Building Safety Regulator show promise but cannot fully address deeper cultural and systemic challenges.
The industry's transformation of safety practices over the past two decades offers a valuable blueprint. Focused leadership, robust programs, and cultural shifts have drastically reduced injury and fatality rates. Safety plans, risk registers, toolbox talks, and continuous training have embedded a safety-first mindset on worksites. By applying similar strategies, the industry can build a culture of quality that delivers safer, more reliable, and higher-value projects.
We've made incredible strides in construction safety by embracing a culture of documentation and proactivity. Think SWMS, risk assessments, near-miss reporting – it's all about anticipating problems before they happen. Why not apply that same rigour to quality? Detailed building methodologies, quality risk registers, and a system for tracking and analysing defects – these are the tools that can shift the industry from fixing problems after the fact to building quality in from day one.
Tom Proctor
Solutions Engineer, Enterprise
Procore
Table of contents
Learning from Safety: Quality as a Shared Responsibility
Shared responsibility is the cornerstone of a robust quality culture. Unfortunately, the construction industry often operates with a "pass-the-blame" mindset, shifting responsibility down the chain and leaving subcontractors vulnerable to quality failures. This blame culture hinders collective ownership and improvement. Transforming this mentality requires prioritising quality as rigorously as safety. Every stakeholder - clients, designers, builders, subcontractors, and suppliers - must champion quality. A holistic approach that integrates quality management into every project stage is key to this transformation.
Quality often suffers from a culture of passing responsibility instead of shared ownership. Many ITPs, including those from owners or developers, are designed to deflect accountability downstream, while imposing unrealistic targets for complex, low-buildability designs.
Tom Proctor
Solutions Engineer, Enterprise
Procore
Shape the Future of the Built Environment at Procore's Construction Summit
Engage with construction leaders and discover the latest technology and best practices that are driving change across the industry.

Strategies and Practical Steps for Improving Quality
Take a proactive approach to documentation and reporting
A key lesson from safety improvements is the power of standardised documentation and reporting. For project managers tasked with identifying and addressing deficiencies, clear processes are essential to initiate corrective actions and prevent rework. What does this look like?
Standardised Reporting Templates
Create industry-standard templates that capture essential details: the nature of the deficiency, location, responsible parties, and required corrective actions. Currently, there's no consistency in quality documentation (e.g., ITPs). Consistency ensures clarity and accountability.
Real-Time Digital Tools
Use construction management software to log deficiencies, upload photos, and tag stakeholders. These tools facilitate transparency, allowing teams to address issues promptly and collaboratively.
Detailed Deficiency Reports
Include specific descriptions of deviations, supporting evidence (annotated photos or drawings), and references to contract documents, standards, or specifications. Comprehensive reporting reduces ambiguity and streamlines corrections.
Prioritisation of Issues
Categorise deficiencies by severity and potential impact. High-risk issues that compromise safety or compliance should take precedence. Prioritisation helps allocate resources effectively.
Clear Communication Channels
Establish protocols for sharing deficiency reports with stakeholders, ensuring issues are addressed constructively. Regular follow-ups prevent delays in corrective actions.
Regular Quality Walks
Similar to safety inspections, these on-site evaluations identify potential issues in real time. Use digital tools to create time-stamped records for post-project analysis and continuous improvement.
We need to find the sweet spot in quality management – robust enough to drive real improvement, but not so bogged down in paperwork that it cripples smaller firms. We can't let the quest for perfect documentation become the enemy of actual quality on the ground.
Tom Proctor
Solutions Engineer, Enterprise
Procore
Implement data-driven bidder selection
Clients and builders should use data-driven frameworks to evaluate partners' quality performance by:
- Benchmarking historical project data to assess contractors' ability to deliver high-quality projects on time and within budget
- Establishing clear quality benchmarks during tendering to ensure subcontractors meet rigorous standards
- Prioritising contractors and suppliers with proven quality excellence records
Imagine a world where developers can select bidders not just on price, but on a proven track record of quality, efficiency, and collaboration. Data makes that possible. By leveraging the insights from past projects, we can move beyond gut feelings and towards evidence-based decision-making in construction.
Tom Proctor
Solutions Engineer, Enterprise
Procore
This approach ensures quality performance directly influences project awards, incentivising contractors to uphold high standards.
Use a holistic approach to construction management
The international standard for integrated management systems (ISO 14001) recognises the interconnectedness of quality, safety, and environment. Neglecting quality during construction often leads to bigger issues later. For example, an unaddressed water leak results in mould growth - a direct safety hazard for building occupants.
This example shows how poor quality impacts both safety and the environment. By proactively addressing quality concerns, such as ensuring proper waterproofing, builders can avoid potential hazards and costly rework. This leads to better buildings, reduced environmental impact, and a more sustainable construction industry.
We need to stop treating safety, environment, and quality like separate boxes to be ticked. It's all connected in the end – a well-run project delivers on all fronts. And with technology, we can finally start using data to understand those connections and make smarter decisions from the design stage all the way through handover.
Tom Proctor
Solutions Engineer, Enterprise
Procore
Consider creating a quality risk register
Just as safety relies on risk registers, quality risk registers can:
- Identify responsibility for specific tasks
- Link work to relevant British Standards, Building Regulations, and other UK-specific regulations
- Highlight potential failure points and mitigation measures
Digital formats ensure seamless information transfer across teams and enable real-time updates, enhancing accountability and efficiency.
Implement quality talks and walks
Toolbox talks - a cornerstone of safety - can adapt for quality. Before starting work, teams can discuss:
- The day's tasks and potential quality risks
- Mitigation strategies to achieve quality success
Similarly, quality walks - like safety walks - allow site managers to:
- Identify potential issues early
- Celebrate successes and recognise quality workmanship
- Capture time-stamped digital records to inform continuous improvement
Adopt industry-wide benchmarking
Industry-wide benchmarking systems enhance transparency and drive collective improvement. Peer comparisons -similar to sustainability assessments like BREEAM - can:
- Enable companies to measure performance against key quality indicators
- Encourage healthy competition and adoption of best practices
- Leverage tools like Procore's benchmarking metrics to revolutionise how the industry evaluates and manages quality
Transforming the Industry: A Call to Action
Transforming construction culture to prioritise quality alongside safety creates better structures and work environments. Embedding quality in every project phase benefits everyone: projects deliver on time and within budget, risks decrease, reputations improve, and construction professionals experience greater job satisfaction and pride.
While numerous investigations have highlighted quality control issues in UK construction, meaningful change requires a deeper cultural shift. By learning from the successful transformation of safety practices over the past twenty years, the industry can create a similar quality culture. This involves prioritising quality as rigorously as safety, embracing a holistic approach that integrates quality management across all project stages, and utilising data-driven tools and benchmarking systems to drive continuous improvement. This transformation will lead to better buildings, a more sustainable industry, and a more rewarding work environment for everyone involved.
Categories:
General Industry, Project Management, Safety and Compliance, Tech and Data
Tags:
Written by
Tom Proctor
Before joining the world of technology, Tom worked as a Contract Administrator. This hands-on experience gives him a unique perspective that he leverages in his current role at Procore, where he has been for the past two years. Tom is passionate about helping construction businesses understand best practices in project management solutions. He helps construction businesses understand best practices around project management solutions and the many benefits they can provide.
View profileReviewed by
Zoe Mullan
Zoe Mullan is an experienced content writer and editor with a background in marketing and communications in the e-learning sector. Zoe holds an MA in English Literature and History from the University of Glasgow and a PGDip in Journalism from the University of Strathclyde and lives in Northern Ireland.
View profileExplore more helpful resources

Leveraging Analytics for Better Financial Forecasting in Construction
Financial forecasting is a difficult task in any industry. In construction, where companies need to manage volatile material costs, labour shortages and variation orders on a daily basis, fluctuations in...

Strategies to Prevent Rework: The Importance of Clear Instructions
In construction, “rework” is the dreaded process of redoing tasks due to mistakes, quality issues, or safety concerns. This unnecessary work drains budgets through wasted materials and labour while causing...

Mastering Document Control in Construction Projects
The construction industry generates enormous volumes of paperwork. A single project can produce countless documents, making organisation, accessibility, and security essential. Construction document control systematically manages project-related documents, giving teams...

Understanding Construction Disputes and How to Avoid Them
A construction dispute is the situation that a client and a contractor face when there is a disagreement over the contractual terms of a project. It is a conflict that...