How Cost-Plus Contracts Work in Construction

A cost-plus contract provides reimbursement for all of the costs associated with a construction project, plus a fee to account for the contractor’s overhead and profit. Construction project owners may employ this type of contract when they want to get a project moving quickly or when the scope of work is unclear, making it difficult to estimate the total cost. That said, the total price for a cost-plus contract may ultimately be higher than it would be with other contract types. Below, we’ll provide an in-depth look at how cost-plus contracts work, a cost-plus contract example, and the pros and cons of this contract type.

How cost-plus contracts work

A cost-plus contract is a construction agreement that requires reimbursement for project costs as well as a markup that covers the contractor’s overhead and profit. In other words, the name is a short-hand way of remembering what the contract covers: project costs plus contractor markup. 

This contract type is most common between a project owner and general contractor, though it may also be used with general contractors and subcontractors.

The contract signed by the project owner and general contractor will specify exactly what costs are considered project costs. Also called direct costs, project costs typically include all costs directly associated with construction activities — with the bulk of the costs coming from labor, materials, and markup from subcontractors. 

The contract will also lay out how the contractor’s markup is calculated. There are a few common arrangements for handling the contractor’s fee:

• Percentage of cost: The contractor receives a markup equal to a certain percentage of the total project cost. This percentage fee can vary across projects and industries, but it’s typically set between 5 and 25 percent.
• Fixed fee: The contractor receives a flat fee that’s determined during contract formation.
• Incentive fee: The contractor receives incentives on top of the predetermined fee if they meet contract targets, like cost savings or a faster timeline.
• Award fee: The contractor receives an award on top of the predetermined fee if they exceed performance expectations laid out in the original contract and construction documents.

Notably, cost-plus contracts are often easier to negotiate because of the reduced risk for contractors. Unlike lump sum contracts, in which contractors could face reduced profits when project costs exceed expectations, cost-plus contracts guarantee that the contractor will have costs reimbursed and still receive their fee.

That said, a cost-plus contract is not a blank check from a project owner to a general contractor. Generally, the contract will include a clause that requires the contractor to provide the owner a good faith estimate for the total cost of a project. Additionally, the contractor will provide a schedule of values that indicates the estimated cost of each aspect of the project — and this schedule will later be used as subcontractors submit applications for progress payments according to the percentage of completion. 

It’s in the best interest of the general contractor to clearly communicate a reasonable estimate for the project. If the GC comes in near (or under) the estimated budget, the project owner will be more likely to trust the contractor and work with them again in the future. Also, a general contractor that does not provide a realistic estimate may struggle later with denied change orders — leading to project costs that are not reimbursable, cutting into the GC’s fee. 

Therefore, even though a cost-plus contract provides a favorable financial situation for the GC, they tend to benefit more over time by providing great value to the project owner. Lastly, it’s important to note that cost-plus contracts do not cover costs associated with a contractor’s mistakes or negligence — though they may cover situations related to estimating errors.

Advantages of cost-plus contracts

Cost-plus contracts have some benefits for both project owners and contractors. Advantages of cost-plus contracts:

Generally speaking, project owners who are more concerned about timeline and quick negotiations (rather than budget) benefit from using cost-plus contracts, as these tend to be easier to arrange with general contractors.

General contractors prefer the reduced risk associated with cost-plus contracts, as these arrangements provide a near guarantee that the contractor will be profitable on the project while having all direct costs reimbursed.

Disadvantages of cost-plus contracts

Nonetheless, cost-plus contracts present some disadvantages for the parties involved — though these can usually be mitigated with careful contract formation and relationship building. Disadvantages of cost-plus contracts:

First of all, a basic cost-plus contract leaves the owner unsure of the final construction cost, which could lead to an over-budget project. Additionally, cost-plus contracts often work best when both parties have already built trust over time, so owners who use this contract type with unknown entities could end up with disputes over scope or cost throughout the project.

Also, general contractors must provide sufficient documentation of costs and percentage of completion throughout the project in order to get reimbursed. This requires a more sophisticated cost management system than many construction companies use with other types of construction agreements. Additionally, change orders on cost-plus projects can potentially lead to disputes if the project owner is already feeling squeezed by rising costs.

One way to avoid these disadvantages is to include a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) with the original contract. While GMP contracts exist on their own, it’s also possible for a cost-plus arrangement to include a guaranteed maximum price — also called a cost cap provision or not to exceed clause — which protects owners by limiting the total amount the owner is responsible for paying. 

This clause can incentivise contractors to keep total project costs down while ensuring the owner stays under a predetermined ceiling for their budget.

Additionally, trust is key with a cost-plus contract. When a long-term partnership emerges between a project owner and a general contractor, both parties are incentivised to keep good faith so that the partnership continues in the future. The short-term gains of taking advantage of the owner on one project are outweighed by the long-term gains of future projects and collaborations.

Cost-plus contract example

Let’s take a closer look at an example of a cost-plus contract for a hypothetical construction project.

A property development company approaches Greene Construction, a general contractor they’ve previously worked with, to help convert a decommissioned airplane hangar into an upscale retail space. This type of negotiated tendering is common, and the trust these two businesses have already established makes a cost-plus arrangement less risky for the project owner.

The two parties sign a cost-plus contract, and Greene Construction provides a good-faith estimate for the total project cost as well as a schedule of values. Before signing the contract, Greene Construction had already contacted preferred specialty contractors, so they had a good idea of what each aspect of the project would cost. Price quotes from each of those subcontractors informed each item in the schedule of values since Greene Construction is a general contracting firm that does not self-perform any work.

The cost-plus arrangement that Greene Construction signed stipulated that they would receive reimbursement for all project costs as well as a fee of 10 percent of the total project costs to cover their indirect costs, overhead, and profit.

As the project goes on, specialty contractors submit pay applications to Greene Construction, who request draws from the project owner by providing supporting documentation to demonstrate a certain percentage of work completed according to the schedule of values. In some cases, costs — like labor or materials — may have shifted from the original estimate, and these costs are generally covered by the project owner as long as they are covered by the contract and construction documents.

Occasionally throughout the project, the general contractor may need to have a change order approved to amend the original contract — otherwise, the cost won’t be reimbursable. As long as both Greene Construction and the development company agree on the change, the contract is amended and construction continues. Occasionally, two parties may need to use the dispute resolution process spelled out in the contract, which typically involves binding arbitration.

Once the project reaches substantial completion, the project owner prepares to make final payments to Greene Construction to cover their costs and fee. The original cost-plus contract stipulated that all remaining project costs and contractor fees would be paid out within 30 days of both parties signing the Certificate of Substantial Completion. At this point, Greene Builders prepares to address items in the defect list and pay any retainage to its subcontractors.

By using a cost-plus agreement, Greene Construction has managed to secure a significant fee with relatively low risk, and the property development company was able to complete construction within a favorable timeline by lowering the burden of negotiations on the front end.

Other contract types compared

Cost-plus contracts are useful in a variety of situations, but they aren’t the only type of construction contract that owners and contractors can use for a project. Depending on the project’s details and the owner’s approach, different types of contracts may be the best fit.

For example:

• Lump sum contracts lay out a fixed fee for services at the onset of the project, which provides a more predictable budget for project owners than a cost-plus contract does.
• Guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contracts set an upper limit on costs for the project owner, above which the construction manager at risk (CMAR) absorbs any additional costs, which makes GMP contracts less risky for project owners than cost-plus contracts.
• Time and materials (T&M) contracts establish a fee for labor and material costs (which include the contractor’s overhead and profit), which makes it similar to cost-plus contracts, though contractors must be careful to calculate their fees correctly in order to stay profitable.
• Unit price contracts bill for repeatable units of work — like framing a patterned residential home — and only resemble cost-plus contracts in the sense that both allow for project costs to trend upward if the scope of work increases during the project.

Finding the right contract for a project helps contractors and project owners balance financial risk with the potential upside of larger profit margins. There is no single best contract type, and many construction projects involve hybrid contracts or different contract types for different aspects of the project.

Importance of contract formation

Contract formation is a time for both project owners and contractors to mitigate their financial risk on a project. Carefully reviewing clauses related to reimbursable and non-reimbursable items, change orders, dispute resolution, payment applications, and more can ensure that conflicts are avoided — which will ultimately make a project smoother and more profitable for all parties involved.

Using the right contract type is an important financial management strategy for owners and contractors.

Owners need their projects to provide a sufficient rate of return to pay back their lenders and turn a profit, so carefully selecting a contract type that keeps costs within budget is paramount.

Contractors, meanwhile, often take on a lot of financial risk early in a project due to mobilisation costs and retainage — both of which increase start-up costs and delay profits. By using a well-defined contract, general contractors and specialty contractors can work to ensure their projects are profitable despite the risks associated with complexity and uncertainty.

Written by